Running a limited company offers directors the opportunity to manage their income through a variety of legal and financial channels. However, this flexibility can be misused—intentionally or not. Drawing too much money from a company, especially when it lacks the financial strength to support those withdrawals, can result in serious consequences. From improper dividend declarations to overdrawn loan accounts, understanding the risks and responsibilities tied to company finances is essential for any director.
Acceptable Ways to Take Funds Out of a Limited Company
Unlike sole proprietorships, limited companies are treated as separate legal entities. This means the company’s finances must remain distinct from those of its directors or shareholders. Any money withdrawn must be done in accordance with established legal and tax guidelines. The following methods are the most common and accepted ways for directors to legally extract value from their company.

Receiving a Salary and Claiming Allowable Expenses
Company directors are often also employees of the business. As such, they are entitled to receive wages. Typically, directors opt for a modest salary, usually within the bounds of their personal tax-free income allowance. This approach allows them to minimize tax liabilities while still maintaining contributions to national insurance and pension schemes.
In addition to salary, directors can be reimbursed for genuine business expenses such as travel costs, office supplies, or meals incurred during work-related activities. These reimbursements must be recorded accurately and substantiated with receipts or invoices to ensure compliance.
Issuing Dividends from Profits
Another popular method of withdrawing money from a limited company is through dividends. These are profit distributions made to shareholders, and directors who own shares are eligible. However, a dividend can only be issued if the company has recorded a surplus after deducting all expenses and liabilities.
The volume of dividends a director can take depends on their ownership share. A sole shareholder could potentially receive the full distributable profit, while a director with a minority share would only receive a proportional amount.
It’s vital to hold a formal meeting with appropriate documentation when declaring dividends. This demonstrates that the decision was made transparently and in line with legal obligations, providing evidence in the event of scrutiny from tax authorities.
Accessing Funds via a Director’s Loan
Funds drawn from the business that don’t qualify as wages, dividends, or expenses are categorized under a director’s loan. These are recorded in a dedicated account that tracks money the director owes to—or is owed by—the business.
Problems arise when the account is overdrawn, meaning the director has taken out more than they’ve put in. To avoid penalties, the balance must be settled within nine months following the company’s financial year-end. If it isn’t, the company may incur additional tax charges, and the director could be personally liable for repayment.
The Danger of Distributing Dividends Without Adequate Profits
Sometimes, directors anticipate profits and declare dividends based on forecasts rather than actual earnings. If revenue falls short and the company hasn’t earned enough to support the dividend, the distribution becomes unlawful.
In such cases, the amount received is not viewed as a legitimate dividend but instead classified as a repayable loan. Directors must return the funds or treat them through the director’s loan account—and, again, pay the balance within the specified nine-month window to avoid further complications.
Issuing dividends prematurely can be a red flag for underlying financial instability, such as weak cash flow or mismanagement. It may also invite investigations from regulatory bodies, especially if the company later enters financial difficulty.
High Compensation During Financial Trouble: A Risky Decision
There is no legal cap on how much a director can pay themselves in salary or dividends, provided the business can afford it. Problems begin when generous compensation is drawn during a time when the company is struggling to pay creditors, suppliers, or taxes.
In the event that the business enters a formal insolvency process such as liquidation or administration, a licensed insolvency practitioner will investigate the reasons behind the financial collapse. Part of this review includes an evaluation of director conduct.
If the investigation reveals that directors paid themselves more than the business could handle—whether through high wages or dividends—it could be deemed irresponsible or negligent. Potential consequences include personal liability for company debts, financial penalties, and even a ban on serving as a director for several years.
The Legal Implications of an Overdrawn Loan Account in Insolvency
A director’s loan account that remains unpaid becomes a liability when a company faces insolvency. Since the funds technically belong to the company, an outstanding loan from a director is viewed as an asset the company can recover.
If the company enters liquidation, the appointed liquidator will attempt to reclaim this amount to redistribute to unpaid creditors. Directors who fail to resolve their debts with the company may find themselves subject to legal proceedings aimed at recovering the money. This may extend to enforcement action against personal property or, in severe cases, lead to personal bankruptcy.
The presence of an unresolved director’s loan can also factor into claims of mismanagement or unfit conduct, opening the door to additional sanctions, including director disqualification.
Taking Money from a Business on the Brink of Collapse
When a company is insolvent—that is, when its liabilities exceed its assets or it can no longer meet its debt obligations—directors have a legal duty to prioritize the interests of creditors. Continuing to trade or withdrawing company funds after recognizing signs of insolvency can lead to serious accusations.
If directors extract money during this period—especially to repay personal loans or prioritize payments to themselves or close associates—it may be deemed a preferential transaction. Such payments are viewed as unfair advantages over other creditors and are subject to reversal.
The insolvency practitioner can petition the court to retrieve those payments and redistribute them according to creditor hierarchy. Beyond financial restitution, the director may also be held personally accountable for damages and may be banned from holding directorships in the future.
Closing Down a Business: Options and Considerations
There are lawful avenues for closing a business, whether it is solvent or insolvent. For a solvent company, voluntary strike-off or Members’ Voluntary Liquidation (MVL) are common paths. In insolvency, options include Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL) or administration.
When considering closure, it’s vital to seek professional advice. A business advisor or licensed insolvency practitioner can explain the best strategy, depending on the company’s financial status and the goals of its directors.
Attempting to shut down a company while evading debt obligations or hiding improper transactions could lead to further legal exposure. Transparency and professional guidance are key to ensuring the process is handled correctly.

Repercussions of Financial Mismanagement
Directors are expected to act in the best interest of their company and its stakeholders. Taking too much money from a limited company, especially during financial distress, can be perceived as a breach of fiduciary duty.
If the company fails and a formal investigation takes place, the director’s decision-making and financial activity may be closely reviewed. A pattern of self-serving behavior or imprudent withdrawals may lead to charges of wrongful trading.
Depending on the findings, penalties can range from repayment of funds to full personal liability for certain debts. In the most serious cases, the director could face disqualification for up to 15 years, limiting their ability to serve on company boards or operate other businesses.
Tips for Avoiding Financial Pitfalls
There are several ways directors can reduce the risk of inadvertently harming their business or facing personal consequences:
- Keep detailed and accurate records of all transactions, including expenses, dividends, and loans.
- Consult a qualified accountant before withdrawing large sums.
- Avoid making financial decisions based solely on projected earnings.
- Regularly review the company’s solvency and cash flow status.
- If financial difficulties arise, seek guidance from insolvency professionals early.
Being proactive in financial management not only protects the company’s health but also shields directors from unintended legal consequences.
FAQs
Can directors take money from a limited company whenever they want?
No, a limited company is a separate legal entity, so directors must withdraw money through approved methods like salary, dividends, or director’s loans.
What happens if a director takes more money than allowed?
Excess withdrawals can result in an overdrawn director’s loan account, which must be repaid or may lead to tax penalties and legal consequences.
Can dividends be issued if the company isn’t profitable?
No, dividends can only be paid from retained profits. Issuing them unlawfully can lead to personal liability and legal challenges.
Is it risky to pay high salaries during financial difficulty?
Yes, doing so may be viewed as irresponsible if the company later fails, potentially resulting in personal liability or disqualification.
What is a preferential payment in insolvency?
It’s when a director pays themselves or related parties before other creditors. This is illegal and can be reversed by a liquidator.
How does insolvency affect overdrawn director loans?
The loan becomes a recoverable asset for creditors, and directors may face court action if they fail to repay it.
What should directors do if their company is struggling financially?
They must stop trading, seek professional advice, and prioritize creditor interests to avoid wrongful trading accusations.